Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Jun 2011 17:45:45 +0100 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On 06/16/2011 04:32 PM, Jon Peatfield wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Denice wrote:
>>
>> > For those interested in esoteric data, I've extracted SL release
>> > announcements from the mailing lists and have recorded them in a
>> > spreadsheet. I have used mailing list archives which I saved, so
>> > the data may not be complete or entirely accurate.
>> >
>> > See:
>> > http://trshare.triumf.ca/~deatrich/all/sl/
>>
>> I see that x.6 releases seem to take longer than other point releases.
>>
>> I suppose that this may be because of how TUV makes changes during a
>> life-cycle e.g. that the x.6 release is their last chance to sneak in
>> support for new-hardware which then makes things harder for the sl wizards
>> to beat into shape...
>>
>> -- Jon
>
> SL 5.6 is late for two reasons
>
> 1 - We had RHEL 6.0 (a major update), RHEL 5.6 and RHEL 4.9 all come out in a
> short period of time.
> 2 - The installer gave us trouble.
I didn't mean to imply that it (or any release) was late. Sorry if it
sounded like I was meaning that.
-- Jon
|
|
|