Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 17 May 2011 08:56:58 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Miguel,
I've been trying to think how to make the question and answer more clear
and I'm having a hard time.
What is your exact question, and I will get an answer for it.
Troy
On 05/16/2011 01:53 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
> Hi Troy.
>
> This is the URL that I found about licensing:
>
> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal/view?searchterm=gpl
>
> It speak about rpms licenses and something of S.L, but it is not much
> clear.
>
> Thanks
> Miguel.
>
>
>
>
> El vie, 13-05-2011 a las 10:27 -0500, Troy Dawson escribió:
>> On 05/12/2011 05:09 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have a question about licences.
>>>
>>> I have just read in FAQ question that SL has a GPL license. Do anybody
>>> know witch version of license is? 1, 2 or 3?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Miguel.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Miguel,
>> Can you point me to which FAQ question you are referring to. (The whole
>> URL please) It sounds like it wasn't clear and it would be good to
>> clean it up.
>>
>> I *believe* I was referring to the various scripts and packages that are
>> SL specific. Everything that we write for SL is GPL v2. I think back
>> when I wrote that FAQ, GPL v2 was the latest version.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Troy
>
>
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|