SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 17 May 2011 08:56:58 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
Hi Miguel,
I've been trying to think how to make the question and answer more clear 
and I'm having a hard time.

What is your exact question, and I will get an answer for it.

Troy

On 05/16/2011 01:53 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
> Hi Troy.
>
> This is the URL that I found about licensing:
>
> https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal/view?searchterm=gpl
>
> It speak about rpms licenses and something of S.L, but it is not much
> clear.
>
> Thanks
> Miguel.
>
>
>
>
> El vie, 13-05-2011 a las 10:27 -0500, Troy Dawson escribió:
>> On 05/12/2011 05:09 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have a question about licences.
>>>
>>> I have just read in FAQ question that SL has a GPL license. Do anybody
>>> know witch version of license is? 1, 2 or 3?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Miguel.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Miguel,
>> Can you point me to which FAQ question you are referring to.  (The whole
>> URL please)  It sounds like it wasn't clear and it would be good to
>> clean it up.
>>
>> I *believe* I was referring to the various scripts and packages that are
>> SL specific.  Everything that we write for SL is GPL v2.  I think back
>> when I wrote that FAQ, GPL v2 was the latest version.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Troy
>
>


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2