SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Miguel Angel Diaz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Miguel Angel Diaz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2011 08:53:33 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
Hi Troy.

This is the URL that I found about licensing:

https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/faq/legal/view?searchterm=gpl

It speak about rpms licenses and something of S.L, but it is not much
clear.

Thanks
Miguel.




El vie, 13-05-2011 a las 10:27 -0500, Troy Dawson escribió:
> On 05/12/2011 05:09 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I have a question about licences.
> >
> > I have just read in FAQ question that SL has a GPL license. Do anybody
> > know witch version of license is? 1, 2 or 3?
> >
> > Regards
> > Miguel.
> >
> 
> Hi Miguel,
> Can you point me to which FAQ question you are referring to.  (The whole 
> URL please)  It sounds like it wasn't clear and it would be good to 
> clean it up.
> 
> I *believe* I was referring to the various scripts and packages that are 
> SL specific.  Everything that we write for SL is GPL v2.  I think back 
> when I wrote that FAQ, GPL v2 was the latest version.
> 
> Thanks
> Troy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2