SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Nico Kadel-Garcia <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 May 2011 00:22:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Zoran Ovcin <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 05/15/2011 04:58 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Zoran Ovcin<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> It worked out.
>>>
>>> Now I am on Scientific linux, yum update passed ok.
>>
>> Great. What does "yum list extras" say? And did you re-install all
>> your packages, so you're not in license violation with Red Hat ?
>>
>
> For now, since I hadn't updated RHEL6, only packages that are newer in SL6
> than matching packages in RHEL6 are updated. But, yum update works.
>
> What is with extras packages? Are they within SL6? Can they be updated also?
>
> Zoran

That command shows RPM's that are not part of your currently enabled
repositories. It's very handy, when switching repositories, to
identify ones that you don't want sticking around. In this case, it
would help reveal packages from RHEL or CentOS or whatever you
switched *from* that had different versions and might cause depencency
conflicts.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2