SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 May 2011 10:27:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
On 05/12/2011 05:09 AM, Miguel Angel Diaz wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a question about licences.
>
> I have just read in FAQ question that SL has a GPL license. Do anybody
> know witch version of license is? 1, 2 or 3?
>
> Regards
> Miguel.
>

Hi Miguel,
Can you point me to which FAQ question you are referring to.  (The whole 
URL please)  It sounds like it wasn't clear and it would be good to 
clean it up.

I *believe* I was referring to the various scripts and packages that are 
SL specific.  Everything that we write for SL is GPL v2.  I think back 
when I wrote that FAQ, GPL v2 was the latest version.

Thanks
Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2