SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 13 May 2011 00:09:10 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
On 2011/05/12 21:52, Nathan Yehle wrote:
> SL got mentioned here:
>
> http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2011/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-centos.html
>
> "Well, that party is over.  Last week Dag publicly announced he was resigning from CentOS development work, seemingly over development team communication issues.  In the comments there, Dag specifically suggests Scientific Linux as the right distribution to move to now, saying "their process is more open and the people are actually friendly to feedback."
>
>
> Still no centos 6 but SL6 is looks to be going strong thanks again!  I haven't had time to try SL6 yet but I hear it has some nice features to share memory between kvm vms.
>
> -Nate

Nate, after surviving over a decade of RedHat/Fedora, Mandrake/Mandriva,
and Ubuntu groups this is the most civilized group I've run across in
the Linux world. (Mint is not bad. But, it's tainted by Ubuntu.)

Even the BSD groups I visted are more civilized than the nain Linux
groups. And as I say, so far this group stands head and shoulders over
all the other related groups I've monitored.

Kudos folks.
{^_^}   Joanne Dow

ATOM RSS1 RSS2