SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 May 2011 13:55:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (185 lines)
Hi,
ftp.scientificlinux.org
ftp1.scientificlinux.org
ftp2.scientificlinux.org
rsync.scientificlinux.org
are all separate servers.  But they all get their files from the same 
back end file server.
I just ran a double check on all of the servers to make sure they all 
came up with the same sha1sum on the 6.0 x86_64 iso files (all of them) 
and they all produced the same checksum.

What is much more likely is that somewhere between you and our servers 
is something that is doing web caching.

Troy

On 05/23/2011 12:14 PM, Braja Kishore Chattaraj wrote:
> The issue was resolved after I downloaded the ISO files from the
> following link -
>
> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/
>
> <http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/>The
> link that is on the SL website most definitely has incorrect ISOs staged
> for the "Everything Disk 1 & 2" links. The links are -
>
> http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
> <http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso>http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD2.iso
>
> The downloaded sizes did not match what was posted on the website. It
> was smaller. I got the exact same file sizes on 3 retry attempts. Spent
> a bunch of time trying to figure the problem till I got the mail from
> Denis with this new link. Looks like FTP and FTP1 are 2 separate servers
> and they are not mirrored. This should be addressed ASAP to avoid
> further agony to others.
>
> Braja
>
>
> --- On *Sat, 5/21/11, jdow /<[log in to unmask]>/* wrote:
>
>
>     From: jdow <[log in to unmask]>
>     Subject: Re: SL x86_64 checksums not matching
>     To: [log in to unmask]
>     Cc: "Braja Kishore Chattaraj" <[log in to unmask]>, "Denis
>     Fateyev" <[log in to unmask]>
>     Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 12:47 PM
>
>     Are the files exactly the same length? If the one you downloaded first
>     is longer it might have downloaded with "CRLF" manipulations.
>
>     {^_^} Joanne
>
>     On 2011/05/20 23:28, Braja Kishore Chattaraj wrote:
>      > The download from the
>      > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/
>     server you
>      > specified in the link in your mail below resulted in a proper
>     checksum.
>      > There is definitely something wrong with the files staged on the
>      > http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/
>      > <http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/>
>     server.
>      >
>      > Thanks for the link.
>      > Braja
>      >
>      >
>      > --- On *Sat, 5/21/11, Braja Kishore Chattaraj
>     /<[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>>/* wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > From: Braja Kishore Chattaraj <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Subject: Re: SL x86_64 checksums not matching
>      > To: "Denis Fateyev" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Cc: "Scientific Linux" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 11:22 AM
>      >
>      > One difference I notice is your link points to http://ftp.....
>     while the
>      > one I used through the SL website points to http://ftp1..... website.
>      > Those are probably 2 separate servers. I am downloading now using
>     your link.
>      >
>      > What utility did you use to compute the checksum of the ISO files?
>      >
>      > Braja
>      >
>      >
>      > --- On *Sat, 5/21/11, Denis Fateyev /<[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>/* wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > From: Denis Fateyev <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Subject: Re: SL x86_64 checksums not matching
>      > To: "Braja Kishore Chattaraj" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Cc: "Scientific Linux" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 11:09 AM
>      >
>      > Those two files: "SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso" and
>      > "SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD2.iso" will be enough for
>      > full installation. "SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Install-DVD.iso" image
>      > doesn't contain the entire distribution but capable for basic
>     install.
>      >
>      > They passed all SHA1/SHA256 checks.
>      >
>      > I see there is an public torrent tracker but seems it is not
>      > functional. I wasted few hours waiting for seeders appearance, but
>      > there was no luck.
>      > So I decided to download it from the HTTP resource I have provided
>      > above.
>      >
>      > ---
>      > wbr, Denis.
>      >
>      >
>      > On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Braja Kishore Chattaraj
>      > <[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>      >
>      > Which files did you download - the first 2 or the 3rd? I had
>      > checksum mismatches on all 3 with MD5 and SHA1. Is there an
>      > alternate / mirror site to download from?
>      > [ ] SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso
>      >
>     <http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD1.iso>
>      > 02-Mar-2011 17:21 4.1G
>      > [ ] SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD2.iso
>      >
>     <http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Everything-DVD2.iso>
>      > 02-Mar-2011 17:22 1.0G
>      > [ ] SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Install-DVD.iso
>      >
>     <http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/SL-60-x86_64-2011-03-03-Install-DVD.iso>
>      > 02-Mar-2011 16:36 3.9G
>      >
>      > Thanks,
>      > Braja
>      >
>      >
>      > --- On *Sat, 5/21/11, Denis Fateyev /<[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>/* wrote:
>      >
>      >
>      > From: Denis Fateyev <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Subject: Re: SL x86_64 checksums not matching
>      > To: "Braja Kishore Chattaraj" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Cc: "Scientific Linux" <[log in to unmask]
>     <[log in to unmask]>>
>      > Date: Saturday, May 21, 2011, 10:37 AM
>      >
>      >
>      > Hello,
>      >
>      > I just have installed SL-6.0 from DVD images taken from there:
>      >
>      > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/x86_64/iso/
>      > http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.0/i386/iso/
>      >
>      > SHA1/SHA256 checksums match, and installation process
>      > doesn't bring any issues.
>      >
>      >
>      > ---
>      > wbr, Denis.
>      >
>      >
>


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2