Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 26 May 2011 09:37:50 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 05/26/2011 08:29 AM, Zack Yovel wrote:
>
>
> 2011/5/26 Phong Nguyen <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>
>
> On 25 May 2011, at 1557, Zack Yovel wrote:
> >
> > Funny, the reason I need windows is virtualization. I have tons
> of Hyper-V machines that I need for a course I take, and from what
> I've seen QEMU/KVM are missing 'revert snapshot'-like feature which
> is extremely important to me. Tried using these VHD's in Virtualbox,
> It's doesn't work really good. so for now, windows host should stay.
>
> If you're going to be using Hyper-V (either in bare-metal or full
> Windows Server mode) will you need to bother with dual-booting? Why
> not just run Linux virtualized?
>
> - Phong
>
>
> 1. Hyper-V does not support RHEL. The only linux distro it supports is SUSE.
I'm not quite sure where you read that, but according to RedHat it does
http://www.redhat.com/promo/svvp/
I also know of a couple of places that have to use Hyper-V for their
virtualization infrastructure, and they are running SL5.
I have no comment on performance, I just know that it runs.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|