SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: fatal error during install of SL-6-x86_64-2011-02-11-Everything-DVD1.iso
From:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:13:41 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines) 
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 02/13/2011 01:05 AM, Larry Vaden wrote:
>>
>> Hello SL Developers and Users,
>>
>> . fatal Error during installation of DBUS
>> . .iso was verified after download, burned on Windows 7 using native
>> Windows Disc Image Burner with verify disc after burning
>> . .iso was checked on target machine during installation
>> . HP Desktop, specs at
>> <http://www.shopping.hp.com/shopping/data_sheet/pp164aa.html>
>>
>> kind regards/ldv
>>
>>  From
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/SHA256SUM:
>> 2df53651358ee7c1119566b12221fc5abbe8aad5afb8d8c98abba76a5a0e398c
>> SL-6-x86_64-2011-02-11-Everything-DVD1.iso
>>
>>  From local calculation by sha256sum.exe invoked on .iso prior to burning:
>> 2df53651358ee7c1119566b12221fc5abbe8aad5afb8d8c98abba76a5a0e398c
>> *sl-6-x86_64-2011-02-11-Everything-DVD1.iso
>
> Hi Larry,
> More information is needed about how you were installing.
> Particularly, did you select any extra repositories in the screen where you
> can?
> There is a known bug/feature that when doing an install from the Everything
> set of DVD's, you cannot select any extra repositories.  That is why there
> is an Install DVD, which doesn't have this bug/feature.

Troy et al,

This comes from memory of an old man, not from good lab notes :(

I am quite sure I would have selected the minimal set of repos and
sort of recollect that the default is for sl-base only;  if important,
I can run this again.  Otherwise, please treat this as a RECALL of the
original post due to violation of netiquette in that I hadn't read the
list with regard to the matter before I posted (read: I wrongly
assumed a case of first impression).

For further clarification, I did not "ADD" a repo, such as
2-666-and-beyond.repo :)

Apologies to list members and to the development staff.

BTW, since I'm a n00b to the list, reply-all addresses you with a cc:
to [log in to unmask];  is that the intended behavior?  I
can understand that as well as the alternatives.

kind regards/ldv

ATOM RSS1 RSS2