SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL 5.6 released?
From:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Vaden <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:00:27 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines) 
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Ewan Mac Mahon <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> I'm a little bit hazy on the details, but there are some slides from the
> meeting here[1]:
>  http://indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=8&sessionId=1&resId=1&materialId=slides&confId=106641

Troy,

Ewan's URL says, in part:

• 5.6 release history:
– RedHat released RHEL 5.6 on 13-Jan
– CERN released SLC 5.6 on 20-Jan
– FNAL released SL 5.6 last week
• CERN rolled out SLC 5.6 on desktops and central systems around 28-Jan

Is this correct or incorrect?

(read: my curiosity is killing me based on what I read here.}

My presumption is that non-government use of SL is permitted if not
welcome;  feel free to correct me on that.

As an ISP using CentOS, we'd like to migrate to SL if we are welcome to do that.

kind regards/ldv

Larry Vaden, CoFounder
Internet Texoma, Inc.
Serving Rural Texomaland Since 1995
We Care About Your Connection!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2