SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 3 Feb 2011 15:18:12 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (59 lines)
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Steven Timm wrote:

> I've tested it on i386, x86_64 on my laptop, bare metal servers,
> and Xen instances, all are OK.
> Steve

I tested kernel-xen 2.6.18-238.1.1.el5xen on i386 and x86_64 guests, and 
on the Dom0.  As well I tested 2.6.18-238.1.1.el5 on 2 kvm-based servers
(both them and their 64-bit SL5.5 kvm guests), and all worked fine with this
new kernel..

cheers,
   denice

> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> We have had our first kernel security update following the release of SL 
>> 5.6. We have tested it on a SL5.0 machine.  It installs, runs and openafs 
>> works on it.  I would feel much better if others ran it to make sure it 
>> works for them.
>> 
>> Can others test this kernel out on their machines to make sure it doesn't 
>> break something we didn't expect.
>> 
>> I have also put the new kvm into the x86_64 testing area with the kernel.
>> 
>> To test or update
>> 
>> SL5
>> -------
>>
>>         yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update kernel\*
>> 
>> or you can download rpm's by hand at
>> 
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/kernel/
>> http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/kernel/
>> 
>> kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Troy Dawson
>> --
>> __________________________________________________
>> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
>> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
>> __________________________________________________
>> 
>
>

-- 
deatrich @ triumf.ca, Science/Atlas         PH: +1 604-222-7665
<*> This moment's fortune cookie:
* SynrG notes that the number of configuration questions to answer in sendmail
   is NON-TRIVIAL
 	-- Seen on #Debian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2