SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Florian La Roche <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Florian La Roche <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:18:16 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 08:52:13PM -0500, Andrew Schultz wrote:
> Troy Dawson wrote:
> >Hello,
> >We have released the second Release Candidate of Scientific Linux 6.
> >We are now in a feature freeze, and are only fixing bugs.
> >
> >The release is at
> >http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/
> >
> >DVD and Net Install downloads are at
> >http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/i386/iso/
> >http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6rolling/x86_64/iso/
> 
> Is the x86_64 release held up?  The x86_64/iso directory seems to be 
> missing the updated images and x86_64/os also doesn't seem to include 
> the sl-release package.


Also repodata is from feb 18th instead of the 25th or newer. Probably
a followup problem due to the missing "sl-release" on x86_64.

Also 6rolling/i386/.repodata/ could be removed, some empty leftover...

Thanks for SL6, working perfectly on a dozen machines here,

Florian La Roche

ATOM RSS1 RSS2