SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

February 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Hubert Bahr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:32:19 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Troy
    On review of your repo, I have found some problems.  In 
x86_64/updates/security the *[h6].rpms are not hard linked to their 
counterparts in  i386/updates/security  directory.  In the 
x86_64/updates/fastbugs this is further compounded by the situation 
where some of the binaries are even different in the two directories.  
In my local repository I have found that I can resolve this for example 
by changing to x86_64/updates/security directory and running "for i in 
*[h6].rpm;do ln -f $i {fullpathname}/i386/updates/security/$i.  However, 
this leads to two problems.  1.  I would need to rerun createrepo, and 
2. the next rsync update changes everything back. 
I found 7 different binaries in fastbugs.  and 5 packages  (4 noarch, 
and 1 i686) in the x86_64/os/Packages directory and not in 
i386/os/Packages.  Are these deliberate?

Hubert

ATOM RSS1 RSS2