SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL policy on errata that came out with the 5.6 release
From:
"Morten P.D. Stevens" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Morten P.D. Stevens
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:55:56 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines) 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:owner-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Garrett
> Holmstrom
> 
> >
> > What do you mean with "production install base"?
> >
> > SL6.0 will be based on RHEL 6 (6.0)
> > SL5.6 will be based on RHEL 5 Update 6 (5.6)
> 
> I meant that there are no production systems running SL 6 because there
> has yet to be a stable release.  Thanks for your explanation, Troy.

Unlike CentOS Scientific Linux will continue to provide security update for SL 5.5.

Best regards,

Morten

ATOM RSS1 RSS2