SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

January 2011

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: SL policy on errata that came out with the 5.6 release
From:
Garrett Holmstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Garrett Holmstrom <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Jan 2011 22:49:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
On 1/13/2011 9:29, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
>> Which release has the higher priority? SL 6.0 or SL 5.6?
>
> SL 6.0 has higher priority.

My apologies if I'm missing something, but why does SL 6 get priority 
when SL 5 is the only one of the two with a production install base?

-- 
Garrett Holmstrom

ATOM RSS1 RSS2