Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:43:51 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
Martes G Wigglesworth wrote:
> Greetings all.
>
> I noticed these messages yesterday after returning home from work where
> my SL-6_x86-64 install had just failed.
>
> I decided to try repo switches and minimal installs.
>
I don't know what you mean by "repo switches"
> Whatever you guys did to this install DVD set, it doesn't even make it
> past the first package if the setup requires catapi.
>
Considering "catapi" isn't in the release, it's really hard to test that.
> Did you guys test these dvds at all before making them available on the
> 21-JAN-2011 date? (where this dvd was downloaded)
>
yes
> I haven't seen any update information on this issue so I would like to
> know what I should do to further investigate, or when you will make a
> new set of x86_64 iso since this absolutely seems like a media issue.
>
The iso's work and have been tested quite a bit.
Perhaps you need to make a new set of DVD's and make sure the sha1sum
matches when you download.
Or, since this is a known issue, don't select all the repos.
> I ended up installing pcbsd-8.2 on this system but I really wanted to
> use Scientific Linux 6 since the clusters and everything is run in
> linux. I am about to start doing MPI/GPU research and I would really
> like to test out the SL-6 distribution. (Mostly because I would imagine
> that if it works for DoE then it probably works for my needs as well.)
>
If pcbsd works for you, that is fine. I am a true believer that a
person or group should use what works for them.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/SCF/FEF/SLSMS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|