SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:12:20 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
On 11/04/2010 05:45 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Mark Whidby wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> On a SL 5.0 machine the recent pam update failed:-
>>
>> pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 from sl-security has depsolving problems
>>   -->  Missing Dependency: audit-libs>= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 (sl-security)
>> pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 from sl-security has depsolving problems
>>   -->  Missing Dependency: audit-libs>= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 (sl-security)
>> Error: Missing Dependency: audit-libs>= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 (sl-security)
>> Error: Missing Dependency: audit-libs>= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 (sl-security)
>>
>>
>>
>> The latest version of audit-libs for SL 5.0 appears to be audit-libs-1.5.5-7.
>> What's happened?
>
> SL5.5 has audit-libs-1.7.17-3.el5.
> TUV does not support 5.0, so I guess that Troy and Connie just failed
> to do a thorough test when updating 5.0.
>

You are correct, and we apologize for this.
It's amazing that I haven't skimped on testing for many months and 
haven't found any problems with dependencies.  I miss one package, and 
it is the one with dependency problems.

Working on it.
Expect a fix later today.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2