SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

November 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: pam update
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:45:58 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (25 lines) 
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Mark Whidby wrote:

> Hi,
> On a SL 5.0 machine the recent pam update failed:-
>
> pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 from sl-security has depsolving problems
>  --> Missing Dependency: audit-libs >= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 (sl-security)
> pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 from sl-security has depsolving problems
>  --> Missing Dependency: audit-libs >= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 (sl-security)
> Error: Missing Dependency: audit-libs >= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.i386 (sl-security)
> Error: Missing Dependency: audit-libs >= 1.6.5 is needed by package pam-0.99.6.2-6.el5_5.2.x86_64 (sl-security)
>
>
>
> The latest version of audit-libs for SL 5.0 appears to be audit-libs-1.5.5-7.
> What's happened?

SL5.5 has audit-libs-1.7.17-3.el5.
TUV does not support 5.0, so I guess that Troy and Connie just failed
to do a thorough test when updating 5.0.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2