SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: What packages to add to SL6
From:
Vaclav Mocek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vaclav Mocek <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 00:54:22 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines) 
On 11/05/2010 01:40 PM, Steve White wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> In a discussion last month on sl-devel, two scientific packages
> that aren't in EPEL were proposed:
> 	yorick
> 	scilab
>    
Yes, yes, yes. I vote for Scilab as well.

Vaclav M.

> See
> 	http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1010&L=scientific-linux-devel&T=0&X=0A3B92370D65590DE7&Y=swhite%40aip.de&P=492
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> On  2.11.10, Troy Dawson wrote:
>    
>> Hello,
>> As was stated before, for Scientific Linux 6, if a package is in EPEL,
>> we would like to keep it in EPEL.
>> But there are some packages that we feel should go into Scientific
>> Linux.  This usually because they are needed during the installation
>> process, or for some other reason.
>> I am trying to gather the list of packages we will need to add.
>> Here is what I currently have.
>>
>> - packages changed/added for trademark reasons and/or branding.
>> - SL tweaks packages
>> - openafs (it isn't in EPEL)
>> - icewm (it isn't in EPEL and it would be good during the install)
>> - revisor (will be used for building distributions and sites)
>> - firmware - specifically network based firmware
>>
>> Here is what is in epel thus far.
>> http://mirror.anl.gov/fedora/epel/beta/6/
>>
>>      
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2