Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 23 Sep 2010 10:56:21 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 09:48:21 +0100 (BST)
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Hi,
> I'd never heard of mrepo or cobbler, but
> I think you are working at a different level from the SL docs.
Yep.
> The SL doc recommends ftp and especially rsync as ways of
> *transferring* updates from the master to the mirror.
>
> A quick look at the instructions for mrepo or cobbler suggests
> that they are tools for serving mirrored data and that they can
> both use rsync to collect updates from the master.
Exactly. Maybe my question was not clear enough.
My question was: why SL recommends "low level" tools and not "advanced"
ones? Is there any problem with mrepo (which also does a cretearepo) ?
Is a simple rsync/ftp the best way for doing the mirror?
We're using mrepo (with createrepo) and we're moving to cobbler (a
higher level tool for repos/distro/install...) and we can sleect
a new way for mirroring distros. So, if mrpeo (with its createrepo,
blah, blah...) is not recommmended, we're on time to change to pure
rsync/ftp.
Sorry if I did not ask my question propertly in my first mail.
Cheers,
Arnau
|
|
|