Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:40:49 +0200 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Troy Dawson wrote:
> With many minor releases, we update the version of openafs for that minor
> release. This new version then get's pushed out to the rest of the releases.
> With SL 5.5 we updated openafs to 1.4.12, and we are about to push that
> version out to the rest of the SL5 releases. It currently is in testing, and
> it has passed every updating test I could think to throw at it and it updated
> without any problems.
>
> We plan on pushing this out on Monday - 12 July 2010
>
> To test or update
>
> SL5
> -------
>
> yum --enablerepo=sl-testing update kernel-module-openafs\*
>
> or you can download rpm's by hand at
>
> http: //ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/i386/openafs/
> http: //ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5rolling/testing/x86_64/openafs/
Would there be any interest if we provided kmod-openafs modules that are
kernel-agnostic (or kABI-tracking as we say) from ELRepo ?
The advantage is that the modules keep on working through kernel-updates,
which makes update-cycles (and maintenance) to be less work.
I am tempted to create those packages, but without an interested party
that can provide sufficient testing the effort is kinda moot.
Let me know,
--
-- dag wieers, [log in to unmask], http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
|
|
|