Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:22:46 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dnia 24-06-2010 o 18:19:10 Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
napisał(a):
>> What was the reason not to release the mini_livecd 64bit?
>>
>
>
> A mini_livecd 64bit was never requested so far. An other reason was to
> limit the amount of LiveCDs.
> (...)
> Nevertheless, I've just built a mini_livecd 64bit. Download
> mini_livecd64_SL55_2010-06-24.iso from
>
> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/55/x86_64/
>
> It's not tested, but you may want to give it a try.
Hi,
I did. Some apps didn't open after pressing their buttons when run from CD
- that's the fault of my DVD drive probably - so I went to shell and
installed SL x64 via livecd-install.
Alas, I was not able to up the SL x64. The process stopped (repeatedly) at
the following messages (copied manually from the screen, no trace in logs):
Switching to new root and running in it
unmounting old /dev
unmounting old /proc
unmounting old /sys
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
(here system went to sleep and it has stopped sending messages...)
BTW.1. I looked to the SL partition from other systems and there are no
dev, proc, sys contents.
BTW.2. On the second partition with SL x32 I ended up in "dependency hell"
setting priorities to the same value. I know what I did. ;-) But is there
a general rule what to open first?
I need some apps which I used in Debian like Tea Editor (a must!), gqview
(a must!), opera+firefox (a must!), (good) pdf reader, gftp, sound (a
must), flash (high priority), etc.
As some apps informed the lack of certain libraries I set priorities of
all repos to 10 to have overall picture of what is available. Alas, the
tea was still left without support - no libs it needed.
Do I really need to compile them, against what repo?
BTW.3. The repositories listed on the repo page
http://www.scientificlinux.org/community/repo need little descriptions
IMHO - which one may be used in full alone or together with which, etc.
One hyperlink to external text describing the problem would suffice.
Regards
--
Przemysław Pawełczyk
http://pp.blast.pl
Opera Mail: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|