SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Przemysław Pawełczyk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Przemysław Pawełczyk <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:22:46 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (67 lines)
Dnia 24-06-2010 o 18:19:10 Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>  
napisał(a):

>> What was the reason not to release the mini_livecd 64bit?
>>
>
>
> A mini_livecd 64bit was never requested so far. An other reason was to  
> limit the amount of LiveCDs.
> (...)
> Nevertheless, I've just built a mini_livecd 64bit. Download  
> mini_livecd64_SL55_2010-06-24.iso from
>
> http://www.livecd.ethz.ch/download/testing/55/x86_64/
>
> It's not tested, but you may want to give it a try.

Hi,

I did. Some apps didn't open after pressing their buttons when run from CD  
- that's the fault of my DVD drive probably - so I went to shell and  
installed SL x64 via livecd-install.

Alas, I was not able to up the SL x64. The process stopped (repeatedly) at  
the following messages (copied manually from the screen, no trace in logs):

Switching to new root and running in it
unmounting old /dev
unmounting old /proc
unmounting old /sys

request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c
request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c

(here system went to sleep and it has stopped sending messages...)

BTW.1. I looked to the SL partition from other systems and there are no  
dev, proc, sys contents.

BTW.2. On the second partition with SL x32 I ended up in "dependency hell"  
setting priorities to the same value. I know what I did. ;-) But is there  
a general rule what to open first?

I need some apps which I used in Debian like Tea Editor (a must!), gqview  
(a must!), opera+firefox (a must!), (good) pdf reader, gftp, sound (a  
must), flash (high priority), etc.

As some apps informed the lack of certain libraries I set priorities of  
all repos to 10 to have overall picture of what is available. Alas, the  
tea was still left without support - no libs it needed.

Do I really need to compile them, against what repo?

BTW.3. The repositories listed on the repo page  
http://www.scientificlinux.org/community/repo need little descriptions  
IMHO - which one may be used in full alone or together with which, etc.  
One hyperlink to external text describing the problem would suffice.

Regards
-- 
Przemysław Pawełczyk
http://pp.blast.pl
Opera Mail: http://www.opera.com/mail/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2