Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:26:03 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dnia 19-06-2010 o 19:22:46 Urs Beyerle <[log in to unmask]>
napisał(a):
> Scientific Linux Live CD/DVD 5.5 has been released for i386 and x86_64.
> (...)
> - livecd: CD-ROM for 32bit
> - livecd64: CD-ROM for 64bit
> - livedvd: DVD-ROM for 32bit
> - livedvd64: DVD-ROM for 64bit
> - mini_livecd: Mini CD-ROM for 32bit
Hi,
What was the reason not to release the mini_livecd 64bit?
I got AMD+ATI x64 MoBo platform with embedded Radeon 4200 ATI graphics
plus AMD Athlon II X2 245 (Dual-Core).
For several years I have been using Debian x32 and now x64 but I badly
need something more __stable__.
The problem is that ATI driver (compiled) + flash + blackbox/icewm + opera
browser (x64) make the system NOT rock solid (either screen or part of
Opera window flickers from time to time blocking the whole system - what
is a known problem, see the google search - or the sound freezes in 32bit
version as it happens with x32 mplayer/alsaplayer in x32 Debian).
I do not use KDE or GNOME hence the miniCD versions of any opsys suit me
the best. Just like Debian netinstall CD.
A few days ago I have installed SL Mini-LiveCD. To my surprise the process
went without _any_ problems from X settings and without resorting to ATI
driver! The system works but I'd like to check x64 version and decidedly I
do not want to see the GNOME blob on my system.
I got an impression, it is my personal impression, that x64 Debian has
worked a bit faster. It was a little bit more responsive. Whether it has
grounds in reality doesn't matter - my feelings counts. Anyway the
OpenObjectREXX test showed x64 worked faster than x32 (4.2 mln ops for x64
vs 3.8 mln ops for x32). ooRexx in x32 SL gives ~4.0 mln ops. So far so
good! :-)
Best regards
Przemysław Pawełczyk
--
http://pp.blast.pl
Używam Opera Mail: http://www.opera.com/mail/
|
|
|