Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 17 Jun 2010 01:46:44 -0400 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Connie,
I investigated a slow behaviour of guest VM (paravirtualized SL 48) in my
host computer (host OS SL53). No serious clue was found still. However I
paid attention in my routine checking of all parametrs for the flag 'vmx'
on host OS and the difference with different versions of kernels.
I am not expert in kernels and I asked who may be already has
experience with such the case.
Actually I do not care if the kernel has small problem to show all CPU
flags.
But if the kernel somehow ignores such flag (or reset it!) - it is more
serious.
Thanks for attention,
Andrey
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Connie Sieh wrote:
> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:09:48 -0500 (CDT)
> From: Connie Sieh <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Andrey Y. Shevel <[log in to unmask]>
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Q on the CPU flag 'vmx'
>
> Why do you care if it says "vmx" or not? Does it not work in one of the
> cases?
>
> -Connie Sieh
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Andrey Y. Shevel wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> I would pay attention that in both described cases XEN kernels were used.
>>
>> Andrey
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
>>
>> > Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:58:44 +0100 (BST)
>> > From: Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
>> > To: Andrey Y. Shevel <[log in to unmask]>
>> > Cc: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: Q on the CPU flag 'vmx'
>> >
>> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Andrey Y. Shevel wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello everybody,
>> > >
>> > > I just discovered in my CPU
>> > >
>> > > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5430 @ 2.66GHz
>> > >
>> > > under
>> > >
>> > > [root@pcfarm-new ~]# uname -a
>> > > Linux pcfarm-new.pnpi.spb.ru 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5xen #1 SMP Fri May 7
>> > > 02:05:32 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> > >
>> > > that there is no flag 'vmx'
>> > >
>> > > [root@pcfarm-new ~]# grep vmx /proc/cpuinfo; echo $?
>> > > 1
>> > >
>> > > At the same time when I boot another kernel
>> > > 'xen.gz-2.6.18-128.1.1.el5'
>> > > the flag 'vmx' is in place
>> >
>> > Hmm. The flags are indeed different with xen and non-xen kernels.
>> >
>> > I guess this is because with a xen kernel you are looking at the
>> > capabiities
>> > of the *virtual* CPU, rather than the bare metal processor ?
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
--
____________________________________________________________________
NAME: Andrey Y. Shevel (Chevel) : EMAIL: [log in to unmask] \
Computing Systems Department : http://hepd.pnpi.spb.ru/CSD |
TEL : +7(81371)36040 | POST ADDRESS: Petersburg Nuclear Physics Inst. |
FAX : +7(81371)36040 | 188300, Gatchina, Leningrad district, Russia. |
______+7(81371)46256________________________________________________ /
|
|
|