SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

June 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:09:31 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010, Simon Butcher wrote:

> hi everybody
>
> We run a lot of desktop SL machines running openoffice. Last week there was 
> an update to openoffice.org-ure package to 
> openoffice.org-ure-3.1.1-19.5.el5_5.1.i386
>
> As a result our 5.x machines with openoffice 2.3 have been suddenly upgraded 
> to 3.1 - a bit of a surprise!

> i'm surprised that nobody else seems to be affected by this, or has mentioned 
> the jump to 3.1.

Sorry.
I did reply to Troy's announcement on sl-errrata.
When I got a bounce from the list I thought
   "ah well, Troy has a copy and will do the right thing anyway ..."
and didn't resend to sl-users.

:-(

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2