SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

May 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Titov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Vladimir Titov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 May 2010 19:53:24 +0400
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (28 lines)
>>>>>  On Wed, 5 May 2010, Oleg Sadov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 10:18:06 -0500
>>>>>>  From: Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>  To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>>  Subject: gnuplot42 in SL 5.5
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi All,
>>>>>>  I haven't seen any conflicts yet.  How do people feel about putting
>>>>>>  gnuplot42 in SL 5.5?
>>>>>>  I give it a thumbs up, but I wanted to know how others feel before
>>>>>>  putting it in.
>>>>>>

There are some small differences between 4.0 and 4.2 version,
but I don't see why we should use old version.

However, now the newest version exists, gnuplot-4.4 (see
ftp://ftp.linux-ink.ru/pub/SLCE/5rolling/testing/{SRPMS,i386}/gnuplot/*.rpm).
Some bugs are fixed, some terminals are added,
some new features are released. Why we have to wait a while
before using this version? A few useful applications
use gnuplot as graphical tool, for example octave, maxima etc.
Gnuplot tends to fit these applications (wxwidget etc.)
and we must use newest gnuplot version.

Vladimir Titov, Linux-ink

ATOM RSS1 RSS2