SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

April 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:33:20 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (35 lines)
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> We are looking at puting drbd into SL5.  I do not think our packaging is
> ready to go into SL 5.5, but I'd like to have it tested before putting
> it into contrib, and then we'll see whether we want to put it in SL 5.6.
>
> "DRBD is a block device which is designed to build high availability
> clusters. This is done by mirroring a whole block device via (a
> dedicated) network. You could see it as a network raid-1."

I know nothing about DRBD but isn't there already another implementation 
of something very similar (NBD, ENBD etc)?

   http://nbd.sourceforge.net/
   http://www.it.uc3m.es/~ptb/nbd/

I know that some of the cluster vendors were taking the NBD/ENBD code and 
improving it in various ways.  Is this what DRBD is or does it do more 
than md over NBD can?

[ Not that I've used NBD/ENBD either but I've been told that another 
department are using it a lot as part of a backup solution (not that this 
means much to us)... ]


-- 
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
| "Computers are different from telephones.  Computers do not ring." |
|       -- A. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks", p. 32                  |
---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jon Peatfield, _Computer_ Officer, DAMTP,  University of Cambridge |
| Mail:  [log in to unmask]     Web:  http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2