SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

April 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Oleg Sadov <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:03:58 +0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
02/11/2009 15:09 -0600, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for letting us know.
> We have double checked, and they are all signed now, except for 
> jdk.x86_64, which breaks when we sign it.
> And yes, back in the time, we couldn't get emacs to build and so ended 
> up using CentOS's, so it has the CentOS signature, which is included in 
> the distribution.

Troy, just our 5 cents for 5.5 -- perhaps this magic mantra may help to
build a 64-bit Emacs:

 rpmbuild -ba --define 'dist .el5' --define 'ix86 x86_64' emacs.spec

> Troy

--Oleg

> Glenn Morris wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > In the version of 5.4 currently on rsync.scientificlinux.org, the
> > following packages are unsigned:
> > 
> > i386:
> > iproute-2.6.18-11.el5.i386.rpm
> > rgmanager-2.0.52-1.el5_4.2.i386.rpm
> > 
> > x86_64:
> > iproute-2.6.18-11.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > jdk-1.6.0_16-fcs.x86_64.rpm                    (known issue I think)
> > rgmanager-2.0.52-1.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm
> > 
> > 
> > Also on x86_64, the following produce
> > "warning: xxx.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897"
> > 
> > emacs-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > emacs-common-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > emacs-el-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > emacs-leim-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > emacs-nox-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> > 
> > They seem to be CentOS rpms? Maybe I just need to import
> > /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5, but I haven't needed to before
> > now.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2