On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> OK, first problem.
> This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux.
> Is that an important part?  Can it be removed as a dependancy?
> Do we want to also put that into SL?

Doh, I never thought to check that it actually built on SL without EPEL.
Will get back to you.
>
> Troy
>
> Troy J Dawson wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>> Sorry for not getting back to this.
>> I think it looks ok.  I am goign to put it into contrib first.
>> For SL5 I think we can get it into the full release.
>> For SL4, I'd rather not.  I'd rather leave it in the contrib area.
>> SL4 at *some* point is going to go into legacy mode, and I'd like to keep
>> the added packages down.
>>
>> Troy
>>
>> Steve Traylen wrote:
>>>
>>> any comment?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>  I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4)
>>>>
>>>>  These are some packages here I've done:
>>>>
>>>>  http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/
>>>>
>>>>  which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages
>>>>  present in  SL4/5.
>>>>
>>>>  I do have an open review here for EPEL:
>>>>
>>>>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570318
>>>>
>>>>  but due to lack of interest I guess it is not progressing.
>>>>  If it does progress I'll bump to higher release version in EPEL
>>>>  than in SL and advise SL of its redundancy in SL.
>>>>
>>>>  Please consider gnuplot42 inclusion into SL.
>>>>
>>>>  Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Steve Traylen
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
> __________________________________________________
>




-- 
Steve Traylen