OK, first problem.
This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux.
Is that an important part?  Can it be removed as a dependancy?
Do we want to also put that into SL?

Troy

Troy J Dawson wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Sorry for not getting back to this.
> I think it looks ok.  I am goign to put it into contrib first.
> For SL5 I think we can get it into the full release.
> For SL4, I'd rather not.  I'd rather leave it in the contrib area.
> SL4 at *some* point is going to go into legacy mode, and I'd like to 
> keep the added packages down.
> 
> Troy
> 
> Steve Traylen wrote:
>> any comment?
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>  I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4)
>>>
>>>  These are some packages here I've done:
>>>
>>>  http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/
>>>
>>>  which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages
>>>  present in  SL4/5.
>>>
>>>  I do have an open review here for EPEL:
>>>
>>>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570318
>>>
>>>  but due to lack of interest I guess it is not progressing.
>>>  If it does progress I'll bump to higher release version in EPEL
>>>  than in SL and advise SL of its redundancy in SL.
>>>
>>>  Please consider gnuplot42 inclusion into SL.
>>>
>>>  Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Traylen
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________