Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 25 Mar 2010 20:06:39 +0100 |
Content-Type: | multipart/signed |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Troy, Steve,
On Mar 25, 2010, at 19:53 , Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> Sorry for not getting back to this.
> I think it looks ok. I am goign to put it into contrib first.
> For SL5 I think we can get it into the full release.
it would be good to get this in. I haven't tested the packages yet, but will.
The 5.5 (beta) release would be a very good time to include this, IMHO.
Cheers,
Stephan
> For SL4, I'd rather not. I'd rather leave it in the contrib area.
> SL4 at *some* point is going to go into legacy mode, and I'd like to keep the added packages down.
>
> Troy
>
> Steve Traylen wrote:
>> any comment?
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4)
>>>
>>> These are some packages here I've done:
>>>
>>> http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/
>>>
>>> which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages
>>> present in SL4/5.
>>>
>>> I do have an open review here for EPEL:
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570318
>>>
>>> but due to lack of interest I guess it is not progressing.
>>> If it does progress I'll bump to higher release version in EPEL
>>> than in SL and advise SL of its redundancy in SL.
>>>
>>> Please consider gnuplot42 inclusion into SL.
>>>
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Traylen
>>>
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
> Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
> __________________________________________________
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
|
|
|