Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:29:40 +0000 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 Troy Dawson wrote
> Looks like we didn't get enough testing done, and maybe rrdtool doesn't
> really need to be in the plain SL release. I have no problem pulling it out
> of the release and having people just install it from dag or EPEL,
> whichever they prefer. Since it hasn't gotten into any final release, this
> isn't that much of a problem, I just need to take it out of the
> repositories. Does anyone *really* need it in the release? Is there any
> real reasons why people can't get it from dag and/or EPEL after they are
> installed?
Someone answered:
> If these packages *need* the particular version of rrdtool
> I suggest that it might not be ready for an SL release.
> If they only have tight dependencies because the package build
> put precise version into the package, then those packages
> ought to be remade.
>
> So no, I don't feel that SL needs to have rrdtool.
Is there ever going to be a solution? Now installing ganglia, the gmetad
node never can nightly yum update except by hand, due to rrdtool version
clashes in public SL mirrors.
|
|
|