SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Winnie Lacesso <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Winnie Lacesso <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:29:40 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (23 lines)
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 Troy Dawson wrote
> Looks like we didn't get enough testing done, and maybe rrdtool doesn't
> really need to be in the plain SL release. I have no problem pulling it out
> of the release and having people just install it from dag or EPEL,
> whichever they prefer. Since it hasn't gotten into any final release, this
> isn't that much of a problem, I just need to take it out of the
> repositories. Does anyone *really* need it in the release? Is there any
> real reasons why people can't get it from dag and/or EPEL after they are
> installed?

Someone answered:
> If these packages *need* the particular version of rrdtool
> I suggest that it might not be ready for an SL release.
> If they only have tight dependencies because the package build
> put precise version into the package, then those packages
> ought to be remade.
> 
> So no, I don't feel that SL needs to have rrdtool.

Is there ever going to be a solution? Now installing ganglia, the gmetad 
node never can nightly yum update except by hand, due to rrdtool version 
clashes in public SL mirrors.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2