SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

March 2010

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brett Viren <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brett Viren <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:27:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hi Pete,

Peter Elmer <[log in to unmask]> writes:

> There were also other oddities about the "gcc43 preview" build, e.g. 
> difficulties building boost, that caused the LHC experiments to reject it 
> in favor of our own build(s) of the stock gcc43x. (Subsequent to that decision 
> the "preview" switched to gcc4.4...)

Funny you should say this!  I'm trying to get gcc43 installed just so I
can match what is on the nodes on our RACF farm which are heavily
influenced by ATLAS's needs.  However, I see that the stock
gcc43-4.3.2-7.el5 packages installed.  FWIW, we also rely on Boost and
I've built it (v1.38) with gcc43 and didn't see any problems.  

Thanks,
-Brett.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2