Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:28:20 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim Green wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'n trying to get amanda working on x86_64 SL51
>
> - problem one, an old bug in the amanda rpm causing a segfault
> on a double-freed pointer, fixed by obtaining
>
> amanda-*-2.5.0p2-8.el5.x86_64.rpm
>
> and manually installing,
>
> - problem two, we get backups OK on ext3 filesystems but
> failures on XFS filesystems, google suggests that if amanda
> is compiled on a system without xfsdump installed then the
> amanda will be built without xfs support. I think that this has
> happened
> - question : can I find out if it has XFS support? I can't see a way
>
> - problem three, OK, I'll rebuild it myself, grab the source rpm,
> rpm -i it into /usr/src, cd to /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
>
> rpmbuild -bb amanda.spec
>
> result : configure.in:2588: /usr/bin/m4: builtin `mkstemp' requested by
> frozen file is not supported,
>
> google says due to m4 being too old.
>
> m4 --versionGNU M4
> 1.4.5
>
> this seems to be the newest SL5 m4 available.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> What baffles me is that, if the newest m4 in SL is unable to build the
> amanda package, then how come the SL amanda rpms exist! where they
> compiled on another RH variant in some bizzare "cross distro compilation"
> exercise?!
>
> Any pointers would be gratefully received
>
> Cheers
>
> Jim
Hi Jim,
I can answer the m4 question.
RHEL5 was compiled with a different m4 than is in the distribution.
As a result, SL5 has been recompiled with a different m4 than is in the
distribution.
Here is the version of m4 that we use to compile.
http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/slf5x/SRPMS/SL/m4-1.4.8-1.src.rpm
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|