SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 15 Dec 2009 00:17:44 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (37 lines)
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:

> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Tomas Kouba wrote:
>
>>  Hi everybody,
>>
>>  I am looking for updated package with xfs kernel module. My system is
>>  SL5.2 64bit version
>>  and kernel version is 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen (it's a virtual machine).
>
> # locate /xfs.ko
> /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
> # rpmquery -f /lib/modules/2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.ko
> kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.6.1.el5.x86_64
>
> So the xfs module is included with the 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5xen kernel package.
>
> -----
>
> Before Scientific Linux 5.4, xfs was an SL addition.
> Red Hat included it in Enterprise Linux 5.4

Red Hat only included it for x86_64, so the i386 version is still an SL 
addition...

Note that the RH xfs doesn't play nice with MD RAID-5 though there is an 
unofficial patched kernel floating about which seems to fix it...

-- 
/--------------------------------------------------------------------\
| "Computers are different from telephones.  Computers do not ring." |
|       -- A. Tanenbaum, "Computer Networks", p. 32                  |
---------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jon Peatfield, _Computer_ Officer, DAMTP,  University of Cambridge |
| Mail:  [log in to unmask]     Web:  http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/ |
\--------------------------------------------------------------------/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2