SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

December 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Any 'best' hard drives and incremental backup approaches to home systems?
From:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Konstantin Olchanski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Dec 2009 06:52:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:17:29PM +0000, John Rowe wrote:
> 
> IBM, Seagate, WD have all had problems in this way. IBM sold to Hitachi
> soon after their "Deathstar" problems. 
> 


Now that you mention the well known DeathStar lemons, for me, statistics
worked the wrong way round and I still have a pile of perfectly functional
DeathStar disks sitting on a shelf, would still be using them
if they were not so noisy.


-- 
Konstantin Olchanski
Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow!
Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca
Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada

ATOM RSS1 RSS2