SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

November 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:09:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Hi,
Thanks for letting us know.
We have double checked, and they are all signed now, except for 
jdk.x86_64, which breaks when we sign it.
And yes, back in the time, we couldn't get emacs to build and so ended 
up using CentOS's, so it has the CentOS signature, which is included in 
the distribution.
Troy

Glenn Morris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In the version of 5.4 currently on rsync.scientificlinux.org, the
> following packages are unsigned:
> 
> i386:
> iproute-2.6.18-11.el5.i386.rpm
> rgmanager-2.0.52-1.el5_4.2.i386.rpm
> 
> x86_64:
> iproute-2.6.18-11.el5.x86_64.rpm
> jdk-1.6.0_16-fcs.x86_64.rpm                    (known issue I think)
> rgmanager-2.0.52-1.el5_4.2.x86_64.rpm
> 
> 
> Also on x86_64, the following produce
> "warning: xxx.rpm: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID e8562897"
> 
> emacs-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> emacs-common-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> emacs-el-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> emacs-leim-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> emacs-nox-21.4-20.el5.x86_64.rpm
> 
> They seem to be CentOS rpms? Maybe I just need to import
> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-5, but I haven't needed to before
> now.
> 
> Thanks.


-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2