In keeping with a voting technique I've used before I'll name three 
I like and three I don't.

Like:  1, 8b, and 16
Dislike:  4, 9, and 12

Thanks for continuing to solicit opinions,

Clint

-- 
Clint Bowman			INTERNET:	[log in to unmask]
Air Quality Modeler		INTERNET:	[log in to unmask]
Department of Ecology		VOICE:		(360) 407-6815
PO Box 47600			FAX:		(360) 407-7534
Olympia, WA 98504-7600

On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:

> Hello,
> I'd like to thank everyone who has presented a logo or given their opinion 
> about what logo is best, or what makes a good logo.
>
> I am going to officially say that we cannot accept any more logo's, even if 
> they are good.  At some point we have to actually pick the logo, and that 
> gets hard when new logo's keep coming in.
>
> As we said on the original rules, the judging will not be by the general 
> Scientific Linux community, but by "main developers and labs who have
> a vested interest in Scientific Linux."
>
> That being said, we are interested in everyone's opinion's, and I don't see 
> anything wrong with sending those opinions to the mailling list.
>
> **Schedule:
> *October 21 (evening) - Narrow down logo's based on scalability and the 
> ability to be recognized across a large room (such as a conference)
>
> *October 23 (evening) - Narrow down logo's based on scientific theme
>
> *October 29 - around Noon California time - Announce the winner at Hepix 
> during the "Scientific Linux Status Report and Plenary Discussion"
>
>
> **Links:
> http: //www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/graphics/logo.contest/index_html
> http: //indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=61917
>
> Thanks
> Troy Dawson
>