SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

October 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 23:27:35 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines)
On Thu, 15 Oct 2009, Ken Teh wrote:

> You need to be clear about what you mean by backup.  If you are keeping a 
> mirror of your data, rsync is fine.  But sometimes you want a version of a 
> file from 3 months ago.  rsync is not going to do that for you.

I find that rsync with --link-dest is a good starting point for
scripting multiple backups to the same disk (not the one you are
backing up) which are good for recovering files in that scenario.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2