Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:06:28 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Edward Dowllar wrote:
> I do really like the designs that include the spinning electrons. But, there is something about Entry 1 that is very appealing for its use as a logo. Perhaps its appeal is its simplicity in design and potential broader use. Scientific pursuits encompass a wide variety of disciplines and some might interpret its use is only for physics. That's just my 2 cents. Keep up the good work.
>
> Edward
>
I agree. Pulling on my small knowledge of graphic design, a good logo
should be easily recognizable when printed in grayscale, b&w, and
usually a 2 color palette. I personally would lean toward the 1st entry
because of that. I think it could work better in cases of icons,
letterhead, case badges, etc. KISS.
On the flip side, it would be a major imaging change for SL from a
recognition standpoint.
-Mark
--
Mr. Mark V. Stodola
Digital Systems Engineer
National Electrostatics Corp.
P.O. Box 620310
Middleton, WI 53562-0310 USA
Phone: (608) 831-7600
Fax: (608) 831-9591
|
|
|