SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Matthias Schroeder <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:25:02 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Sangamesh B wrote:
> Dear SL-5.1 users,
> 
>        I'm trying to install an application on CentsOS-5.2. The application works well on ScientificLinux-5.1but its failing to run on CentsOS-5.2(compilation goes smooth). That's because CentOS is lacking some of the rpms compared to SL-5.1.
>        As the program fails by just showing <library name>.so not found error, I'm not able to find from which rpm that library come from.
> 
> Following is the list of missing libraries:
> 
> libGeoBase.so
> libParBase.so
> libBase.so
> libCbmBase.so
> libCbmData.so
> libField.so
> libGen.so
> libPassive.so
> libSts.so
> libTrd.so
> libTof.so
> libMuch.so

To me this sounds like root libs or experiment specific libs, but 
nothing coming from SL, whatever release.

Matthias

> 
> As I don't have SL-5.1, I request any one of you to check which rpm these library belong to, i.e. the following 2 commands
> 
> $ locate libGeoBase
> It will give the path of libGeoBase
> 
> $ rpm -qf <path of libGeoBase>
> It will give the name of rpm.
> 
> Same steps should be carried for other libraries also.
> Send me the list of rpms.
> 
> Thanks for your kind help
> 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2