SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

September 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Tooley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris Tooley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:44:33 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Chris Tooley <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
>> Turns out there is a driver on the P5Q CD for an Atheros AR8121/AR8113
>> Ethernet Adapter.  I ran make && make install and it works!!
>>
>> I think lspci was mistakenly identifying it...
>>
>> If you need more information let me know what commands you'd like to see.
> 
> Could you follow the instructions on the Device ID page of the ELRepo site at:
> 
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/DeviceIDs
> 
> and show us the vendor:device ID pairing of your Ethernet device?
> 
> Akemi


Following those instructions I get these results:
============================
[root@<machinename> ~]# lspci | grep -i Ethernet
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Attansic Technology Corp. L1 Gigabit 
Ethernet Adapter (rev b0)
[root@<machinename> ~]# lspci -n | grep '02:00.0'
02:00.0 0200: 1969:1026 (rev b0)
============================
Looking it up on the list, it looks like I should have tried the atl1e 
controller.

This is interesting though, because the source code that I compiled to 
get the network working identified itself as an "Atheros(R) 
AR8121/AR8113 PCI-E Ethernet Adapter", and looking further into the 
README in the source directory it references "arl1e" several times.

Is this the same as the atl1e driver? I assume it's proprietary vs OSS.. :)

I'm going to uninstall the source compiled driver after I download the 
proper atl1e RPM and see if the atl1e RPM works. I will report back 
afterwards giving results.

Also, is "driver" the proper moniker to use in this case? Should I be 
saying "module"?  Just out of curiosity...

Thanks,
~Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2