SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: yum versions on SL 5
From:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jon Peatfield <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:30:23 +0100
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (14 lines) 
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:

...
> Anyway, I need opinions.  Should I push the newer yum out to all of SL5?
>  Or should I just push it out to SL 5.2 and 5.3?

I'd vote for updating all of them, but it won't make any difference to me 
'cos all our sl5 boxes should already be running 5.3...

[ well my records show 2 x sl51 and 4 x sl52 but those are dead boxes that 
I've not got round to removing yet... ]

  -- Jon

ATOM RSS1 RSS2