SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

June 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:53:47 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> I note that the new test packages
> 5rolling/testing/i386/yum/yum-updatesd-3.0.6-4.sl.noarch.rpm
> 5rolling/testing/x86_64/yum/yum-updatesd-3.0.6-4.sl.noarch.rpm 
> have no epuch, whereas the yum-updatesd-0.9-2.sl.noarch.rpm in
> {52,53}/{i386,x86_64}/SL has epoch 1.
> 
> Are the new packages just for 50 and 51 ?
> 

Yes, those packages were just for 50 and 51.
In RHEL 5.2 yum-updatesd was pulled out of the regular yum and given a 
package all it's own.  Since it's version number was going down, it had 
to get a higher epoch number.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI LMSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2