John Summerfield wrote:

> The major (only?) supporter of reiserfs in enterprise linux, SUSE, now 
> prefers ext3 (and presumably ext4 in the future), so I suggest you wean 
> yourself off reiserfs if/when you can. Hans was pushing/promoting 
> reiserfs4 and not interested in 3 any more, and now he's in the tender 
> care of the US govt I don't think anyone's betting the bank on either 
> version of reiserfs for the future.

thanks for info. hate to hear hans is on a federal vacation. tho better
than a state or local. i was following his case for a while, but ended up
losing track. a great mind is now lost.

i have heard a lot of pros and cons about ext3/4 vs reiserfs3/4, but
i have preferred reiserfs due to it using actual file size and not by
block size.

i guess i can get used to ext fs for systems, but i will hold off until
i have to make change. actually hoping someone will pick up reiserfs and
bring it to a practical point.


-- 

peace out.

tc,hago.

g
.

****
in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
**
help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today
**
to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it;
to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it.
**
learn linux:
'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html
'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html
'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
****