SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

May 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: NFS Performance with SL5
From:
Sven Sternberger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sven Sternberger <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 May 2009 18:20:41 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
On Di, 2009-05-12 at 16:42 +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:

> ... which says that this "can cause data to be lost or corrupted."

also for nfs3? As far as I understand this is a nfs2 problem

> 
> Depending what sort of writes you have no_wdelay might help without
> risking your data.

No no_wdelay don't help. 

regards

svebn

ATOM RSS1 RSS2