SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brunner, Brian T." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Brunner, Brian T.
Date:
Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:21:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (48 lines)
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Bob
Barton
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:16 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: AFS on XFS or ext3?

I certainly don't want to start any flame wars about choosing between
ext3 of XFS.
One reason I was thinking of using XFS was because recently when I set
up an ext3 system, during the setup a note popped up that an fsck would
be forced on the file system after 180 days. Having to take down a
crucial resource for a long period to do an fsck on 2TB of ext3 file
system every 1/2 year is certainly unattractive! I know there are ways
to change this default using tune2fs but I am uncertain what the
implications of doing so are.
My previous experience with AFS file servers has been with AIX3.x -
AIX4.x and Solaris 9 and I essentially turned the systems on and left
them alone for years (literally - they went down whenever the building
power failed for some reason or other). I am hoping that XFS would have
similar characteristics.


======

From my experience with ext3, the fsck takes place upon the first reboot
that takes place 6+months after that pop-up. It doesn't watch it's
wristwatch, say it's been 6 months, and do an fsck (THAT would be
annoying).  So, it waits for a power-fail or shutdown, when disk service
is normally not expected.

If an ext3 fs is mounted read-only (like my /usr partition) fsck never
runs on it at reboot, no matter what.

My systems, also, are left running for years; and they're located in
charming get-aways like Kazakhstan: irate users are to be avoided at all
costs.
*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**

ATOM RSS1 RSS2