SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 09:39:47 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Klaus Steinberger wrote:
> Hi Troy,
> 
>> Synopsis:    Important: kernel security update
>> Issue date:    2009-02-10
>> CVE Names:    CVE-2008-4933 CVE-2008-4934 CVE-2008-5025
>>                 CVE-2008-5713 CVE-2009-0031 CVE-2009-0065
>>                 CVE-2008-5029 CVE-2008-5079 CVE-2008-5182
> 
> i think the companion kmod-gfs and kmod-gfs-xen modules are missing, 
> shouldn't the newer modules from 5.3 should be put into the errata 
> together with the new kernel?
> 
> Sincerly,
> Klaus

I guess this shows that no matter how long you have something in 
testing, it doesn't get tested until you push it out for real.

You are probrubly correct.  The only problem is that I now have to test 
and see gfs, gnbd, and cmirror stuff also have to go along with that 
update.  Maybe nothing, maybe a bunch.  I'll let you know later today.

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2