SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS Archives

February 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:47:16 +0000
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (31 lines)
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Sorry to contradict you, but if someone does what you say, they will install
>> "all* the kernels and *all* the kernel-modules.
>> No, do *not* substitute "update" for "install", they mean two totally
>> different things.
>
> I think you meant "Do not replace 'update' with 'install'...".  That
> is, "yum update" is the correct method.
>
> I am a Japanese and I myself have some difficulties with the word
> "substitute". But I understand "to substitute A" implies "to place the
> word A in there", but not "to replace A".  :)

No. "substitute" does mean remove the old thing and "replace" it with the 
new one. However the order may be different, especially if (as they should 
be) the preposition is different. I think proper grammar is
 	Substitute A for B
 	Replace B with A.
In both of these B is the old, removed item and A is the new, installed 
item ...

I've had to think carefully written this; it must be confusing
for a non native speaker.

-- 
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison		Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[log in to unmask]	http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna

ATOM RSS1 RSS2