SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL Archives

January 2009

SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL@LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Troy Dawson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:02:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
LE DREZEN JEAN-YVES wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>  
> I recently registered myself to the SL Security ERRATA mailing list.
> I was wondering if it would be possible to add the severity of the issue 
> in the mail message, in order to better manage priorities in mail 
> processing ...
>  
> It could look like:
>  
> Security ERRATA for bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
> becoming:
> Security ERRATA (Moderate) for bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
>  
> Thank you for your valuable work,
> Best regards,
> 
> Jean-Yves LE DREZEN
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 4, rue Louis de Broglie
> BP 50444
> 22304 LANNION CEDEX
> FRANCE
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 33.2.96.04.80.93
> Fax: 33.2.96.04.84.95
> 
>  

That's a good idea, and shouldn't be too hard to implement.
I will have to tweek my templates ... Hmmm ... looking at things, it would be 
easier for me to have

Security ERRATA Moderate: bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64

With the four levels being Low: Moderate: Important: Critical:

Does that sound OK to everyone?
If things aren't too piled up, I could get this working with today's security 
errata.

Anyone against this or have any other easy to implement ideas?

Troy
-- 
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [log in to unmask]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2