Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:02:20 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
LE DREZEN JEAN-YVES wrote:
> Hi Troy,
>
> I recently registered myself to the SL Security ERRATA mailing list.
> I was wondering if it would be possible to add the severity of the issue
> in the mail message, in order to better manage priorities in mail
> processing ...
>
> It could look like:
>
> Security ERRATA for bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
> becoming:
> Security ERRATA (Moderate) for bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
>
> Thank you for your valuable work,
> Best regards,
>
> Jean-Yves LE DREZEN
> Alcatel-Lucent
> 4, rue Louis de Broglie
> BP 50444
> 22304 LANNION CEDEX
> FRANCE
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 33.2.96.04.80.93
> Fax: 33.2.96.04.84.95
>
>
That's a good idea, and shouldn't be too hard to implement.
I will have to tweek my templates ... Hmmm ... looking at things, it would be
easier for me to have
Security ERRATA Moderate: bind on SL3.x, SL4.x, SL5.x i386/x86_64
With the four levels being Low: Moderate: Important: Critical:
Does that sound OK to everyone?
If things aren't too piled up, I could get this working with today's security
errata.
Anyone against this or have any other easy to implement ideas?
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [log in to unmask] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
|
|
|